Bonds Investment TV

3 investments for an era of low interest rates


By MARK JEWELL, AP Personal Finance Writer – 2 days ago 
Article from associated press

BOSTON (AP) — The Federal Reserve is making it increasingly hard for investors to earn anything, unless they're willing to accept plenty of risk. Ben Bernanke and his Fed are playing the role of adviser, encouraging Americans to get a little more adventurous by shifting savings out of low-yielding bonds and putting it to work in stocks.

The latest nudge came last week when the Fed said it doesn't expect to raise its benchmark rate until late 2014, at the earliest, because the economic recovery remains fragile. Rates have been near zero since December 2008. The latest extension means borrowers can expect another three years of low-cost loans and mortgages.

However, it's more bad news for savers and retirees depending on investment income, particularly when there's 3 percent inflation. Investors who value earning stable returns from Treasury bonds end up with little more than satisfaction that they're faring better than people keeping money in traditional savings accounts.
Consider that investors committing to lock up their money for a full decade were only being paid 1.8 percent for buying U.S. Treasurys this week. And yields have turned negative for investors trading 10-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, or TIPS. On Wednesday, the yield was negative 0.28 percent. In essence, investors are willing to pay Uncle Sam to borrow their dollars for 10 years, because the opportunity to minimize losses is attractive compared with other options.

That may be patriotic if the government puts that borrowed cash to work to stimulate the economy. But it's no way to invest for your future.

"I don't know why people would pay the U.S. government to borrow their money, unless they're very, very pessimistic," says Robert Horrocks, chief investment officer and a portfolio manager with the Matthews Asia mutual funds.

Returns are even smaller for money-market funds, safe harbors where investors can park their cash until they're ready to put it back into the market. Money fund returns are closely tied to interest rates, and their returns have been barely above zero for three years. They're now averaging 0.02 percent — call it nothing. Don't expect improvement until the Fed pushes rates back up.

Here's a look at three relatively low-risk alternatives to generate some income in a low interest rate environment:

1. Dividend stocks

Dick Bristol, a 74-year-old retired Air Force major from Biloxi, Miss., counts on dividend-paying stocks for his retirement security. His investment portfolio is nearly 100 percent in stocks that make regular payouts, and he and his wife count on a few hundred dollars of dividends coming in each month.

Of course, dividend-paying stocks are not immune from market drops. And companies often cut dividends when the economy skids. But Bristol is convinced the potential returns are worth the risks. In August, he invested in Dynex Capital, a real estate investment trust. The stock has since risen 8 percent and has a high dividend yield of 12 percent. That's the amount of the dividend paid divided by the share price.
"Keep in mind that if you invest in something that's earning 1 to 2 percent, you're losing out to the 3 inflation we've got now," Bristol says. "Over the long run, nothing pays like dividend stocks."

2. High-yield bonds

These bonds are issued by companies with credit problems. High-yield investors expect higher returns because there's a greater risk of default than with companies possessing investment-grade ratings. And they've gotten them recently. Mutual funds specializing in high-yield bonds have produced an average annualized return of 19 percent over the last 3-years.

Anne Lester, lead manager of JPMorgan Income Builder (JNBAX), has recently been adding to the fund's holdings in high-yield bonds. They now make up 44 percent of a portfolio that also is invested in stocks. Corporate default rates remain low and high-yields are attractively priced compared with Treasurys and other bonds, Lester says.

The market is pricing high-yield bonds "as if we were in a recession, and we're clearly not in one," she says.
But high-yield bond investors face plenty of risks. Chief among them is the possibility that Europe's debt problems spin out of control. That could put the domestic economic recovery at risk, potentially leading to a spike in corporate defaults and losses for high-yield investors.

3. Municipal bonds

Investments in the bonds of state and local governments typically won't make you rich, because returns are generally low. But muni bond interest payments are exempt from federal taxes. That protection may extend to state taxes if the munis are issued by the state in which the investor lives. Investors can pocket attractive returns even after taxes, because the tax hit can be sizeable for those in higher income brackets.

Muni bond funds have been on a terrific run, with average returns of nearly 15 percent over the last 12 months. But don't expect double-digit returns this year. Muni bond prices have rebounded from a market scare in late 2010, when the poor financial condition of many states and cities left investors nervous about a surge of defaults. Although many governments remain troubled, there has been no default surge and municipal bankruptcies declined last year, says Jim Colby, a muni bond analyst with Van Eck Associates.
A setback for the economic recovery could put more pressure on government budgets. But Colby says munis remain an attractive alternative to Treasurys. He's expecting muni returns to average 4 to 5 percent over the next few years.

"Munis give an investor opportunity," he says, "at a time when so many are saying, 'Boy, I'm having a hard time stomaching these low Treasury yields.'"
Questions? E-mail investorinsight(at)ap.org

Article from associated press

European Bond Rally May Have Legs


FEBRUARY 2, 2012
Article from The Wall Street Journal

By RICHARD BARLEY

Europe's disaster movie isn't guaranteed a sad ending. So, investors shouldn't shy away from the region's investment-grade corporate bonds, even though they returned a bumper 2.9% in January. They still look unloved. A 4.2% yield on five-to-seven-year bonds is far above German bund yields and prices in a lot of risk.

Last year, European corporate debt priced in a credit crunch. But the European Central Bank's liquidity injections staved off a systemic crisis. Average European corporate-bond spreads tightened to 2.8 percentage points over government bonds, from 3.3 during January. That still is far above 2011's tightest of 1.6 points.

But the market continues pricing in disaster. The iTraxx Europe index of credit-default swaps on 125 European blue-chip companies, a proxy for corporate-bond spreads, costs €139,000 ($181,842) a year to insure €10 million of debt against default for five years. Assuming a 40% recovery rate, the index is pricing in a five-year default rate of 11.4%, says Tradeweb. Yet the peak default rate since 1970 was 2.4%, says Deutsche Bank. With corporate balance sheets strong and economic data improving, high defaults look unlikely.

Of course, if the euro-zone crisis spins out of control, history may prove of little value. But investors have to put cash to work. Those with absolute yield targets may be tempted to ditch government bonds for higher corporate yields. January's rally could have further to run.

Write to Richard Barley at richard.barley@dowjones.com


Article from The Wall Street Journal

Safety First, Says Muni Bond Manager


1/30/2012 @ 1:12PM |75 views
Article from Forbes

Investors seeking income in the muni field should stick with general obligation and essential revenue bonds, says Bill Walsh, who manages a muni portfolio for his clients. He advises staying away from more speculative instruments.

Kate Stalter: We’re talking about municipal bonds today with Bill Walsh, of advisory firm Hennion & Walsh.

Bill, tell our listeners why you believe munis are a good investment in today’s economy, and with the volatile equities market.

Bill Walsh: Well, I think municipal bonds have proven, in this economy—and certainly with the volatility of the equity market—to be a very, very good place for people that are looking for conservative income to invest in.

I think it proves out that bonds are…I always say bonds are boring. You know, last year, I guess there were some headlines on it, and they tried to get them to be something more than what they are. But historically, if you buy high-quality bonds, you get your income every six months, and when principal comes due, you get your money back.

So it’s a pretty boring investment. But it’s certainly proved to be something worthwhile for the individual investor over the course of the last 50 or even 100 years.

Kate Stalter: You mentioned some of the headlines in the past year or so, and one thing obviously comes to mind: There were some dire predictions from some analysts about potential defaults, which did not pan out as predicted. Do you think some investors were scared off by that?

Bill Walsh: There’s no question. I think there were definitely investors who were scared off by that, which again was—I guess “silly” is the right word—but because of their fears and because of the headline fear or trying to trade the headline, created liquidations.

A lot of mutual funds had liquidations putting a lot of single-issue bonds in to the market, and the people that actually understand bonds and wanted to take advantage of it really got a tremendous value when that happened.

Kate Stalter: So it represented a buying opportunity, for those who understood?

Bill Walsh: Yeah, definitely, definitely. It was a huge buying opportunity, and enabled investors to lock in to some very, very attractive tax-free yields.

Kate Stalter: I wanted to talk a little bit, Bill, about your investment philosophy specifically. How you invest in bonds on behalf of your clients?

Bill Walsh: Well, again, we look at it very, very simply. We look at each investor and each client individually, and we want to know what’s their goal and what’s their objective.

But I would say for most of our clients, their objective is income, and they don’t want to be speculating. They don’t want to have the volatility that other investments will provide. So they want safety.

With income and safety, it’s a pretty easy process. For individual investors we always suggest they look at high-quality bonds, being like general obligation bonds, essential purpose revenue bonds, especially like a year ago when there were dire predictions.

We say, “Well alright, in a bad economy what, what pays?” Stay with high-quality, stay with essential revenue, things that need to be and will be paid and you’ll be fine.

So that’s always really been our philosophy in good times and in bad. High quality, don’t speculate with your safe money, and buy the best yield available.

Kate Stalter: Any particular holdings or even classes of holdings within the muni bond universe that stand out right now?

Bill Walsh: Again, no. I don’t know if there’s any one class at this moment.

What we suggest for the individual investor is still based on the things we were even talking about a year ago. The rates are lower on the bonds, because the supply is diminished. The demand is stronger, again, because people aren’t being scared out of them, but that’s for safety.

You know, if your goal is income, then invest for safety. If your goal is growth, then I don’t know if bonds really fall into that category. You might want to be looking at other investments.

There’s Euro coupon bonds and things of that nature, but in general, income and safety…invest for safety. Stay with general obligation bonds, which are backed by the full faith and credit of a municipality. Stay with essential-purpose revenue bonds, whether it be a water and sewer authority or a highway authority, something like that. Something that you know the revenue is there. Don’t speculate in this market.

Really, in the last couple years, the full ratio on bonds, historically, are negligible. But things that you saw that did have issues were basically these land deals and these community development districts. Stay away from those. Normally when they come out, they’re nonrated and they’re speculative and you might get a touch higher yield, but you run the risk of losing your principal dollars. So stay away from those.

High-quality sectors—GOs [general obligations] and essential purpose revenue bonds—are what I would say would be the two main types of categories.



Article from Forbes